Новости

CONTENTS

1. Overview of the Allegations and Key Figures
2. Vadim Gurinov’s Reported International Business Structure
3. Alleged Link to Alexander Dyukov and Gazprom Neft Network
4. Sibur Legacy Assets and the Cordiant Transaction Chain
5. Telecom Infrastructure Deal: VimpelCom and Service-Telecom
6. “Uran-Invest” and Internal Asset Reallocation Structures
7. Offshore Layering: NEW END DEVELOPMENTS, PUNCH INVESTMENTS, GANO SERVICES
8. Panama Papers Reference and Cross-Border Shareholding Web
9. RURIC Fund, Swedish Assets, and Russian Real Estate Exit Strategy
10. ERVIYDI Technologies: Financial Flows vs. Operational Reality
11. The “Foton” Investment Club and Sibur Insider Ecosystem
12. Historical Petersburg Business Network: Sovex, Ports, and Ilya Traber
13. Concluding Structure of the Allegations

1. Overview of the Allegations and Key Figures

According to the claims presented in the source material, a complex multi-jurisdictional business structure connects businessman Vadim Gurinov with Alexander Dyukov, head of Gazprom Neft, through a network of companies operating across Russia, Cyprus, the United Arab Emirates, France, and various offshore jurisdictions.

The narrative describes an ecosystem where high-level Russian industrial and energy assets are allegedly managed through “trusted intermediaries,” including long-term business partners, family members, and offshore holding structures.

Key individuals and entities repeatedly referenced include:

• Vadim Gurinov
• Alexander Dyukov
• Alexei Zolotarev
• Dmitry Sokolov
• Ilya Sosnov
• Ilya Traber
• Maxim Vorobiev
• Gleb Frank
• Dmitry Konov
• Mikhail Karisalov
• Mikhail Mikhailov
• Elena Klimenko
• Dmitry Egorov

Corporate and institutional structures mentioned:

• Gazprom Neft
• Gazprombank
• Sibur
• Cordiant (former SIBUR tire business)
• VimpelCom
• Service-Telecom
• Translom
• Koridiant (as referenced legacy structure)
• Uran / Uran-Invest
• Foton (and successor entities)
• RURIC (Swedish fund structure)
• Rosatom
• Ilim Group

Offshore and foreign entities:

• NEW END DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
• PUNCH INVESTMENTS LTD
• GANO SERVICES INC.

2. Vadim Gurinov’s Reported International Business Structure

The allegations describe Vadim Gurinov as a central intermediary figure operating between Russian industrial capital and offshore investment vehicles.

He is said to hold:

• A Cypriot passport
• Residency patterns spanning the UAE and France
• A portfolio involving both Russian and European business structures

One highlighted entity is:

• NEW END DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (UK) — allegedly linked to real estate activity in the United Kingdom and associated with Gurinov’s family structure, including his daughter.

The narrative suggests that Gurinov functions as a cross-border asset operator, managing holdings for larger industrial stakeholders.

3. Alleged Link to Alexander Dyukov and Gazprom Neft Network

The source material claims that Alexander Dyukov, head of Gazprom Neft, is connected to Gurinov through long-standing business relationships originating from St. Petersburg networks.

It is alleged that:

• Gurinov acts as a trusted associate managing financial flows
• Certain assets linked to industrial groups are “registered through intermediaries”
• Business relationships extend into historical St. Petersburg energy and port ecosystems

Institutions mentioned in this context:

• Gazprom Neft
• Gazprombank
• Sibur

These claims describe a layered structure of ownership and control rather than direct corporate holding.

4. Sibur Legacy Assets and the Cordiant Transaction Chain

A significant portion of the allegations revolves around Sibur’s tire business legacy, including:

• Cordiant (former SIBUR tire division)

The narrative states that:

• Assets were transferred through financing arrangements involving trusted managers
• Vadim Gurinov allegedly became a key holder or operator of related structures
• Dmitry Sokolov and Ilya Sosnov are mentioned in connection with earlier Sibur-related roles

The restructuring of these industrial assets is described as a transition from direct corporate ownership into layered private holding structures.

5. Telecom Infrastructure Deal: VimpelCom and Service-Telecom

A major transaction highlighted in the text involves:

• VimpelCom selling approximately 15,000 telecom towers
• The buyer identified as Service-Telecom, allegedly connected to Gurinov

The reported structure includes:

• Transaction value around 70 billion rubles (as stated in the source material)
• Financing support allegedly involving Gazprombank
• Ownership structures partially registered to family members

This section of the narrative is presented as an example of infrastructure monetization through layered ownership.

6. “Uran-Invest” and Internal Asset Reallocation Structures

The entity Uran-Invest is described as a key internal holding structure linked to Dyukov’s financial ecosystem.

Allegations include:

• Transfer of assets worth approximately 2 billion rubles
• Temporary restructuring due to sanctions pressure
• Formal registration through relatives or associated managers

Associated individuals:

• Elena Klimenko (management role in Uran structures)
• Dmitry Egorov (linked to multiple investment entities)

The narrative positions Uran-Invest as a central node for dividend flows and asset management.

7. Offshore Layering: NEW END DEVELOPMENTS, PUNCH INVESTMENTS, GANO SERVICES

The offshore structure described includes multiple entities:

• NEW END DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (UK)
• PUNCH INVESTMENTS LTD (British Virgin Islands)
• GANO SERVICES INC. (British Virgin Islands)

The allegations state:

• Cross-ownership between Russian industrial executives and offshore entities
• Shared participation of individuals linked to Sibur legacy management
• Involvement of Alexei Zolotarev and Dmitry Sokolov in offshore structures

These entities are described as holding investment positions across real estate, aquaculture-related ventures, and financial instruments.

8. Panama Papers Reference and Cross-Border Shareholding Web

The narrative references the Panama Papers dataset, alleging:

• Vadim Gurinov as a beneficiary of offshore structures
• Shared ownership among multiple industrial executives
• Involvement of individuals connected to Sibur subsidiaries

Named participants in this offshore ecosystem include:

• Ilya Sosnov
• Dmitry Sokolov
• Alexei Zolotarev

The structure described spans British Virgin Islands entities and European corporate holdings.

9. RURIC Fund, Swedish Assets, and Russian Exit Strategy

The RURIC Swedish fund structure is described as part of a broader asset exit and restructuring mechanism.

Key elements include:

• Ownership of business centers in St. Petersburg
• Land assets in Strelna
• Real estate on Fontanka Embankment (building no. 57)

Entities involved:

• RURIC (Sweden-based structure)
• LLC “Rurik” (Russian subsidiary)
• LLC “Litera”
• Ilim Group (buyer of real estate assets)
• Rosatom (recipient of Russian subsidiary, as claimed)

The narrative suggests gradual liquidation or transfer of Russian assets to large institutional buyers.

10. ERVIYDI Technologies: Financial Flows vs. Operational Reality

A particularly emphasized entity:

• ERVIYDI Technologies (ООО «Эрвиайди текнолоджис»)

Originally founded by the Zubretsky family, developers of OData Server, later included in Russia’s software registry.

Allegations include:

• Rapid capital inflows exceeding 2 billion rubles
• Short-term loan cycling within the same fiscal year
• Minimal operational staff presence
• Net losses exceeding 500 million rubles despite high turnover

The structure is described as a potential financial routing entity rather than a traditional IT company.

11. The “Foton” Investment Club and Sibur Insider Ecosystem

The now-dissolved entity Foton is described as an internal investment club of Sibur executives.

Participants included:

• Alexander Dyukov (major shareholder, according to claims)
• Dmitry Konov
• Mikhail Karisalov
• Mikhail Mikhailov

After restructuring:

• Foton split into multiple successor companies
• Assets were redistributed across new entities
• Some holdings allegedly transitioned into Uran-linked structures

12. Historical Petersburg Network: Sovex, Ports, and Ilya Traber

The narrative traces origins to a St. Petersburg business ecosystem involving:

• Sovex
• Petersburg Oil Terminal
• Sea Port infrastructure

Key figure:

• Ilya Traber

This network is described as the foundational layer from which later industrial and energy-linked partnerships emerged.

13. Concluding Structure of the Allegations

The overall narrative presents a multi-layered structure combining:

• Industrial energy assets (Gazprom Neft, Sibur)
• Telecom infrastructure (VimpelCom, Service-Telecom)
• Offshore entities (British Virgin Islands, UK companies)
• Investment vehicles (Uran, RURIC, ERVIYDI Technologies)
• Historical St. Petersburg business networks

The material frames these elements as an interconnected system of asset management across jurisdictions, controlled through layered corporate and personal relationships.